The problem with “Rent to Own”

By Kyle Brooks

Hi all.

I’d like to make you aware of what Rent to Own is and why it is such a big problem in my opinion.

It can be best explained with a example.

You go to a store, They sell a TV in two different ways.

First way: Buy outright at $2,200.

Second way: Pay $60/week – price is $2,200. When you buy the TV, you’re not really buying the TV. You’re really buying the privilege to have it at a certain address until you pay it off.

Let’s look at the second way:

What is the effective APR? 142%

How much of the per week cost goes to the store? (Interest) $59.86

How much of the per week cost goes to the TV? (Principal) 14 cents

Is this a fair distribution? You decide. Hopefully this hypothetical example should answer this question for you.

A bank provides an savings account at rates of 142 percent compounded quarterly. You put 50 dollars into this account. How much will the account have at the end of 1 year without any monthly additions?

A = P(1 + i)^n

P = $50

i = 1.42 / 4 = 0.355

n = 4

A = 50(1 + 0.355)^4

A = 168.54939003125

which, when rounded up, is $168.55. The interest: $118.55.

Can the bank afford to do that for 1 thousand accounts over 10 years? Look:

$118.55 * 1,000 accounts * 10 years = $1,185,500.

If you opened a rent to own business, you could get that much money if you sold the hypothetical TV about twice every hour for 24 hours, or about once every hour for 8 hours.

Pick one: Rent your TV, or own your TV. Don’t do both for America’s sanity. Please. I beg you.

Leave a Reply