Hi all.
Oh, if only I could say yes… Fortunately, I have sent a complaint to Tubetorial regarding that fact.
I will post correspondence from them until it’s all over, just like I did with PRHC.
Here is the full complaint (I will annotate to explain why I said what. Bolded text is the actual complaint, while non-bolded text is annotated):
–BEGIN
Kyle Brooks
Peterborough, Ontario
Canada
E-mail: cmpfixer@hotmail.com
Phone number: 888 823 5206
Website: http://allaboutbeingdeaf.blogspot.com
To whom it may concern:
I am sending this e-mail to you on the basis of a concern.
I am a deaf blogger. A certain Tubetorial video, “What Bloggers Need to Know about the Law”, located at http://www.tubetorial.com/what-bloggers-need-to-know-about-the-law/, does not have sufficient captioning for me to understand the video. Many other videos do not have sufficient captioning. I do not understand the video because I am deaf. I do not understand many TV shows because they are not captioned, and I get left out of the experience, so I end up switching the channel. (I’d complain, but I need some information for that, and when I watch TV, I am so concentrated in doing so that I don’t usually complain)
Captions are text presented on a video that allow a deaf or hard of hearing person to be able to understand the video and watch the video at the same time.
I feel this is unfair treatment to a deaf person and to the Deaf community as a whole. Would it be fair to a blind person if they could not understand what was going on because no one told them and refused to? Please immediately rectify this concern, or explain to me why captioning videos would be a undue hardship. “Undue hardship” means a severe burden: costly, extensive, etc.
Yours sincerely,
Kyle Brooks
END–